Liam Broady vs Daniel Bagnolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 May at 04:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs D. Bagnolini

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Bagnolini
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Daniel Bagnolini winning 0. The last match between Liam Broady and Daniel Bagnolini was at the M25 Reggio Emilia, 13-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 1 |
| Bagnolini | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Reggio Emilia(05-13-25)
L. Broady vs D. Bagnolini H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,004,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.64% (533-376) | Career Total W/L | 53.94% (89-76) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Broady vs D. Bagnolini Match Preview:
- Broady demonstrates superior performance on their second serve, capturing 44.74% of points as compared to Bagnolini's 35.85%. Could this advantage prove decisive?
- In return games, Bagnolini edges out Broady for both second (47.87% to 45.57%) and first serve returns (34.82% to 30.71%). Will this give Bagnolini an upper hand?
- Broady shows resilience under pressure by saving 55.32% of breakpoints, whereas Bagnolini saves 50%. Does this indicate a mental edge for Broady?
- Over the past year, Broady has won 52.17% of matches, while Bagnolini has only managed 40%. Does Broady's higher win percentage make them the favorite?
- Broady excels on hard courts with a 62% career win rate, while Bagnolini's best surface is clay with a 53% win rate.
- Broady competes primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches, as opposed to Bagnolini's 40% under the same conditions. Does experience at similar event levels influence predictions?
- Analyzing opponent quality, Broady faces higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 360.11) compared to Bagnolini (rank 364.53).
- In deciding sets, Broady has a 50% win rate, whereas Bagnolini boasts a perfect 100%. Will this influence the outcome if the match goes the distance?
- Bagnolini has a higher break point conversion rate at 45% compared to Broady's 39.85%. Could this affect in-game strategies?
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
Broady appears to have the edge in several key performance areas, particularly with stronger second serve efficiency and resilience under pressure during breakpoints.
Bagnolini demonstrates stronger return games and excels in break point conversions, suggesting they could challenge Broady's serve effectively.
Considering past performance trends, surface preferences, and tournament levels, Broady seems to have the advantage, particularly given their higher overall win percentage and hard court proficiency.
Nonetheless, Bagnolini's flawless record in deciding sets could be a crucial factor if the match is tightly contested.
Overall, the likelihood leans towards Broady securing victory, though Bagnolini's strengths should not be underestimated.
Liam Broady vs Daniel Bagnolini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs D. Bagnolini H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:50:15 | Average Match Time | 0:50:15 |
| 58% (15/26) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17/27) |
| 73% (11/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 64% (7/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (2/10) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 59% (16/27) | Return Points Win % | 31% (8/26) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
D. Bagnolini Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs D. Bagnolini Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.64% (533/376) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.94% (89/76) |
| 57.10% (1198/900) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.17% (192/176) |
| 53.01% (10458/9272) | Games Win/Loss | 50.21% (1657/1643) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (13/13) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.74% (75/62) |
| 60.87% (140/90) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 2468 | Aces Total | 60 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1578 | Total Double Faults | 326 |
| 1:14:19 | Average Match Time | 1:6:35 |
| 515.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 348.25 |
| 63% (30281/48160) | 1st Serve % | 66% (4255/6456) |
| 68% (20663/30281) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2586/4255) |
| 52% (9343/17872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1024/2201) |
| 43% (2049/4753) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (340/728) |
| 40% (19069/47794) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2782/6595) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.83% (230/182) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 67.46% (226/109) | Futures W/L | 54.32% (88/74) |
| 59% (521/880) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (88/163) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (137/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (14/26) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (25/40) |
| 87% (522/456) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (81/76) |
| 12% (522/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (81/5) |
| 20% (384/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (84/13) |